Social tagging and RA
There's a new social tagging site making it's way around the library e-world: LibraryThing.com. While I'll probably be a late adopter, if ever, of del.icio.us and I do use Flickr sparingly, I'm ready to jump on the bandwagon of LibraryThing.
Do I hear you asking why?
While the other tagging sites get our information organization juices flowing, LibraryThing has the potential to develop into a strong tool for another aspect of LIS. That, my friends, is readers' advisory. LibraryThing is still in beta form, so it's still got a ways to go. The search interface is one of the features that could use some work, but Tim's made a good start on it. Also, since there is no controlled vocabulary between users, tags are going to vary widely. That is, if they are there at all. However, books are tagged according to how the reader views it. What other tool out there allows for reader classification?
There have been discussions for years in RA on how to find books based on mood. If you had a patron looking for a Linda Howard book like "Mr. Perfect" and all you know about Linda Howard, if you know her at all, is that she's a romance writer, how will you know to recommend "Open Season" or "To Die For" rather than "All the Queen's Men" or "Cry No More"? They're all romantic suspense, right? Yes, they are. However, "Mr. Perfect" and "Open Season" have a humorous bent to them with "To Die For" being more on the humorous end of the scale than the suspense. "All the Queen's Men" and "Cry No More" (an oxymoronic title, if I've ever heard one) are dark, intense, and at times gut-wrenching tales of suspense. In LibraryThing, you could tack on "light" or "humor" to a "Linda Howard" search for readalikes to "Mr. Perfect", and see what pops up.
The biggest hinderance to it's use as an RA tool will be the lack of tagging in some, if not many, cases. I'm excited about it, though, and look forward to watching it's development.